Case study · Campaign operations · Super Bowl LX · 2026

The control system behind a six-day Super Bowl week

In the six days around Super Bowl LX, 41 pieces of Walter Payton Man of the Year content went out across 130 placements. My role was to pressure-test the plan, keep partner activation visible as posts went live, and turn the results into a rule for planning collaborator mix and format together.

At a glance

Role
Within the publishing team: pre-launch pressure test of the full plan, copy QA across every asset doc, collaboration communications and live acceptance tracking, and the post-campaign analysis, with reporting to the publishing lead.
Key decisions
Pressure-test before the week, not during it; enforce copy standards under deadline; track acceptance per post so follow-ups went only where they were worth it; analyze per post, not in aggregate.
Selected result
296K views, 22.6K engagements, 1,795 shares, 31 logged collaboration acceptances, and the per-post analysis that produced next season's collaborator rule.
Demonstrates
High-volume campaign coordination, live partner-activation tracking, and analysis that produced a usable planning rule.

The week

The Walter Payton Man of the Year award is announced during Super Bowl week. Stand Together’s program had five player cutdowns plus legends content ready and more built reactively as news broke; five cutdowns landed inside one 48-hour window around the announcement. Every post carried collaboration tags whose acceptance couldn’t be forced, copy tied to award outcomes that weren’t known at writing time, and subject matter where an overclaim or a wrong player detail would be seen at maximum visibility.

The publishing week
DayContent
MonCampaign intro post; first cutdown repost
TueTwo cutdowns / quick-turns
WedTwo cutdowns / quick-turns
ThuAward-nominee carousel; additional cutdown; on-site event short
FriThree cutdowns land the same day; award-winner post
SatFinal cutdown
Mon (following)Post-game celebration video
Density was the risk. Five cutdowns in the 48 hours around the announcement is what the control system existed to manage.

What was mine

  1. Pre-launch pressure test. I ingested the full week’s plan and reviewed sequences, timing, platform assignments, and tag strategy before anything went live, because conflicts were cheaper to fix on Monday than mid-window.
  2. Copy QA across every player asset doc. I flagged overclaims, buzzwords, near-duplicate headline structures landing in the same week, and a copy-paste error, all before publication, while enforcing the partnership’s copy standards: partner enters mid-copy and never leads; player and cause centered over brand; captions carry the emotional and proof work, headlines carry the curiosity work.
  3. Collaboration communications and tracking. I drafted the notification templates sent to partner contacts and logged acceptance per post, live, so follow-up pushes went only where a tag was pending and still worth chasing.
  4. The post-campaign analysis, built per post rather than as a totals summary.
Release + platform Collaborator tags Published?Live link logged Invite sent Accepted? Logged percollaborator, per post Follow-up only wherepending + worth chasing
The control schema. One calendar linked creative, platform, copy, tags, live URLs, invites, and acceptance, per post. Recreated; no internal workbook is reproduced.

Results

296,160 views, 22,609 engagements, 1,795 Facebook and Instagram shares, and 31 logged collaboration-tag acceptances across the 41 pieces and 130 placements.

The per-post analysis was the more useful output:

Published Larry Fitzgerald Legacy Honoree video
Highest volumeLarry Fitzgerald · 91,970 views · 10,090 engagements
Published Ameer Abdullah Radio Row quick-turn video
Highest engagement rateAmeer Abdullah quick turn · 26,806 views · 4,076 engagements
Published Demario Davis Walter Payton Man of the Year carousel
Award-moment carouselDemario Davis · 19,694 views · 844 engagements

Published campaign work. My role across the week: plan pressure test, copy QA, collaboration tracking, and post-campaign analysis; creative production belonged to the campaign team.

Three posts, three distribution stacks
PostCollaborator stackFormatViewsEngagementsEng. rate
Legacy cutdownPlayer + team + his foundation + league legacy programLong-form cutdown91,97010,090~11%
Quick turnPlayer only at tag time; picked up organically by a third-party page same dayReactive post26,8064,076~15%
Award-moment carouselPlayer + team + leagueCarousel19,694844~4%
Reading the pattern. Tag count predicted reach; collaborator fit and timing predicted engagement. Source: campaign publishing workbook, per-post records.

The work on partner channels

The campaign’s content didn’t live only on brand channels. Program-produced video ran on partner channels too, including the New Orleans Saints’:

Watch on YouTube: Demario Davis' Community Impact, Walter Payton Man of the Year, on the New Orleans Saints channel Demario Davis’ Community Impact | Walter Payton Man of the Year — on the Saints’ channel
Partner-channel distribution, working as designed. Produced within the Stand Together program and published by the New Orleans Saints. My part sat in the program’s publishing layer: the platform copy and collaboration packages for the Davis content, plus the week’s QA and tracking. Production was the program’s creative team.

And the copy itself, from the Davis celebration package I built for the week:

What a season. What a movement.

For three years, we’ve partnered with the Saints’ Demario Davis, watching him lead on the field and in his community. Demario is one of many NFL players using their platforms to drive real change in their communities. These leaders understand that change doesn’t start at the top: it starts with people closest to the challenge.

Here’s to everyone showing up and proving that this game isn’t just for playmakers — it’s for changemakers.

Authored caption from the published celebration package (Instagram version, lightly condensed; handles rendered as names). The package carried per-platform adaptations and a contingency version scripted for either award outcome, written before the winner was known.

What changed next

The collaborator rule: plan the collaborator mix and the format together instead of tagging everyone available, and hold calendar space for reactive posts, because the week’s efficiency winner was the one that caught a moment no schedule could have planned.

Attribution I worked as a contributor within the publishing team, with reporting going to the publishing lead; creative production and channel ownership sat with others. Results are Stand Together brand-channel totals for the campaign week.