David Malkin

Supporting work · Editorial packaging · NBA · 2026

Publishing package: San Antonio Spurs × Lindy Waters III

A documentary film about Spurs forward Lindy Waters III and the team’s decade of work with Indigenous San Antonio had to travel four platforms, past seven outside accounts who might carry it and might not.

What the film needed around it

I wrote the publishing package: the headline set, the long description, the social copy, the platform assignments, and the partner tags.

The story runs from a moment before the 2014 Finals to a phrase now inscribed in Kiowa at the tunnel exit. The copy had to carry that twice over: once for someone meeting Waters for the first time on a phone, and again for someone who arrives by search six months later with no idea who any of these people are.

What a reviewer got

The package arrived with a recommended headline and copy set, and drafted alternates underneath. Someone who preferred a different line was choosing between written options, and the work did not come back for a rewrite.

Recommended: Lindy Waters III is one of 5 Native Americans in NBA history

Alternate: Lindy Waters III is stepping up for the next generation of Native athletes

Alternate: One NBA player is helping Native kids in San Antonio find their identity and confidence

The headline set. A recommendation with a reason to prefer it, and two alternates that would each have worked.
  • Headline set

    Three options, one marked as the recommendation, the other two ready to run.

  • Social copy

    Two versions, written so the pair could be tested against each other.

  • Long description

    Full description for the film, carrying the story for anyone who arrives by search.

  • Platform assignment

    Which cut runs where, settled in the package.

  • Partner tags

    Verified handles per platform, with the gaps marked so nobody tags an account that does not exist.

What the package carried. A reviewer, publisher, and partner could each act from the same document without asking anyone a question.

The partner-tag map

Underneath the copy sat a map of every account that might amplify the film: seven subjects across four platforms, each handle verified, each gap marked. Of the twenty-eight possible tags, five did not exist. Publish time is the wrong moment to find that out.

Partner-tag map: who can be tagged, and where
SubjectInstagramTikTokFacebookYouTube
Lindy Waters IIIYesNoneYesNone
His foundationYesNoneYesYes
San Antonio SpursYesYesYesYes
Spurs play-by-play analystYesYesYesNone
Local Native-led nonprofitYesNoneYesYes
Former Spurs player in the storyYesYesYesYes
The publishing brand channelYesYesYesYes
Twenty-eight cells, five of them empty. Handles differ per platform and several accounts do not exist on some of them, so the map is what makes a tag possible.

What shipped

The film published on June 29, 2026, three days after the package was delivered. The description I wrote ran on it verbatim, opening line to close.

Watch on YouTube: the published film about Lindy Waters III and the Spurs The film, published June 2026 · 8:15
The long description ran verbatim. The published title is a composite of two of my three drafted headlines, which is the ordinary outcome of a client review and worth saying plainly. A team produced the film. My part was the packaging around it.

Why it matters

A film is not ready to travel because the edit is finished. The copy, platform plan, and partner map decide how someone finds it and whether another account can help carry it.

The package on one page: download the overview (PNG).

Attribution and qualification Copy sole-authored by me, delivered June 2026. A team produced the film; design, photography, and thumbnails were team and vendor functions. No performance figures appear on this page. The film has a public view count, but its distribution carried paid support, so it measures neither my work nor the packaging.

← All work